· There are numerous debates about the death penalty, as the opinions on this topic differ in different countries of the world. Most countries have abolished the death penalty, but there are still countries where it is used. As you can see, the author of the argumentative essay about the death penalty above considers capital punishment to be Estimated Reading Time: 5 mins · Capital punishment is a universal problematic ideology under constant debate. Those that oppose the death penalty often agree that it is immoral for the government to take the life of an individual. They frequently state that the death penalty is a cruel and unusual punishment, but our Constitution would never allow such punishments. It states [ ]/5(9) The Death Penalty Debate Essay Words | 3 Pages. The Death Penalty Debate To kill or not to kill. That is the question. Some people think it is wrong; however, a close look into the matter will show it is the right thing to do. The Bible states "thou shall not kill" but it also states "an eye for eye"
A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay - Words | Bartleby
This is in large part because of the views many have toward the rule of law or an acceptance to the status quo. In order to get a true scope of the death penalty, death penalty debate essay, it is best to address potential biases from a particular ethical viewpoint.
By looking at it from several theories of punishment, selecting the most viable theory makes it a plausible case in favor of the death penalty. There is some intuitive merit to the notion that the criminals deserve unhappiness. There is also certain justifications for a criminal system to show that the special relationship between the state and its general population does not lend death penalty debate essay to or allow for the incorporation of the death penalty.
The utilitarian theory is meaningful in nature. Its basis concerns itself with the happiness of society. Ironically, crime and punishment are a contrast to happiness. Instead, they endeavor to inflict as much punishment as necessary to a criminal in order to prevent future crimes from happening.
Under utilitarian philosophy, any law designed to specify punishment to a criminal should be done in a manner to prevent further criminal conduct.
This type of deterrence death penalty debate essay necessary for the greater good of the society, and puts a notice out to other criminals that if they choose to death penalty debate essay a crime, they will also be punished. The goal of this is to prevent future crimes as well. Inclusive is treatment for afflictions such as drug use, and continual violent behavior.
The treatment would then include educational programs to give criminals the knowledge to succeed in the job market. Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject Get your price How it works, death penalty debate essay. It is easy for most people to imagine murderers, especially murderers whose acts are particularly vile, death penalty debate essay, deserve nothing less than the death penalty.
Death penalty debate essay utilitarian mindset is if the murderer is sentenced to death, it would benefit the most number of people. While from the surface it would seem his statement is justified, the utilitarian perspective would be inclined to support this claim and thus stick with their original ideology that capital punishment is necessary provided it produces the most amount of happiness.
The evidence seems to suggest otherwise. What Smith is rationalizing is that he is opposed to the utilitarian way of thinking in justification for the death penalty. This is essentially saying that a crime of this nature murder produces its own punishment, and that no one, by rights of their humanity, is deserving of death.
If one is going to participate in the discussion of capital punishment as an impartial observer, they simply cannot write off the humanity of a criminal. They must ignore the inclinations to dismiss a person altogether and fully consider the humanity of this person and consider the true meaning of making the decision to end their life. It is possible to judge an argument that is based on its merit and not its context; it is also possible that certain traditions death penalty debate essay with the death penalty will have altered the ideas of many great theorists.
The death penalty is often defended as a necessity and yet it is a remnant of some of the most unjust periods in time. Principles that exist today such as freedom, equality, rights, justice, and the value of human life is the standard for successfully arguing against capital punishment because capital punishment violates every one of these principles. After the commission of some heinous crime the punishment of an innocent scapegoat might be deemed necessary to maintain the deterrent effect of the law.
Arguments about punishment are a disagreement about the means, and more often is a disagreement of the ends. The utilitarian justification of the death penalty can be based on experiences. It is easier to see this in the case of more than it is in the case of less.
What this means is that we can all agree that no one should be punished more than they deserve, no matter how useful it is to society.
They would also consider rehabilitative measures to ensure the thief would not get an inclination to want to steal again. Another theory to consider involves incapacitation. The use of incapacitation as a justification for punishment can be intrinsically troublesome in both theory and practice. The use of the three-strike rule effectively says the criminal will be punished three times over. There is an inherent risk with incapacitation because some individuals who are constituted as menaces to society would not have gone on to commit more offenses, death penalty debate essay.
There is the dilemma with someone sentenced to life without parole, thus eliminating any possibility of the aforementioned rehabilitation. In determining the proper course of action from the difference of life imprisonment to capital punishment, it might be evident to consider the former over the latter, death penalty debate essay.
The question behind this dilemma now rests upon just how much time is prudent for punishment as long as the death penalty is not considered as death penalty debate essay option. Since the concept revolves around utilitarianism with respect to rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation in order to prevent future crimes, determining the length of the sentence has proven to be quite difficult. There are federal guidelines that aid in the determining death penalty debate essay, but because every case is different and unique at the same time, understanding the variables is what create the difficulty.
If the public is unhappy, then the length of the sentence must be adjusted accordingly to meet these terms. Think of it like this; a just sentence is a proportionate sentence. Judges impose sentencing, and every case presents unique scenarios and circumstances. In order to achieve proportionality, one must find the right balance that depends on competing sentencing philosophies: utilitarianism or retributivism.
Because utilitarianism has been discussed throughout thus farlet us take a look at retribution. Retribution in the case of criminal offenders carries a separate definition.
The concept of retribution is not necessary because the focus it is not righting a wrong, it is actually preventing future acts. Here is something even more compelling; the virtuous society deserves to be happy, and the vicious criminals deserve to be unhappy. Retribution implies a sort of proportionality. A problem with the requirement for proportionality and equality is that it would require a tradeoff for good behavior that drives someone to punish, which would then propel another person to reward.
This should not matter in a purely retributive system because controlling behavior is not the aim of retribution. Society shows its respect for the free will of the wrongdoer through punishment. The debate of the death penalty is more than just a debate of who is deserving of death, but more so a question that pertains to political and moral implications for the victims, those that impose punishment, and the offender. There is a notion of justice in the idea that the good deserve happiness while the bad deserve punishment, death penalty debate essay.
There is a distinction between who deserves that punishment and who can rightfully be punished. While standing by the notion of the good deserves good and the bad deserves bad, we are not forced to assume it is equal in any death penalty debate essay regard. The general notion death penalty debate essay not exclude the possibility of proportionality rather than equality. The law requires equal proportions of harm doled out against a criminal in a manner that best suits the crime.
This theory would not eliminate the death penalty, except only to limit its use to those extreme cases or circumstances of monstrous criminals. This would then have a dual effect of satisfying the demands of justice while also conveying the necessary majority happiness of society through utilitarianism. fit the most number of people. The Debate of the Death Penalty. com, Dec 18, Accessed October 7, comDec Make sure your essay is original or hire a writer to make it plagiarism-free.
We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our death penalty debate essay writing service. Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert. Topics: Capital PunishmentCrimeCriminal JusticeCriminal LawJusticeMoralitydeath penalty debate essay, PunishmentUtilitarianismVirtue. Category: Law.
Pages : Words : Download: Print: Order Original Essay. How it works. Did you like this example? Cite this page The Debate of the Death Penalty. The deadline is too short to read someone else's essay. Death penalty debate essay MY PAPER. Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade Make sure your essay is original or hire a writer to make it plagiarism-free CHECK MY ESSAY HIRE WRITER.
Leave your email and we will send a sample to you. Email Get sample. Not Finding What You Need? Search for essay samples now Find. Having doubts about how to write your paper correctly? GET QUALIFIED HELP. Thank you! Get help with my paper. Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website.
You can leave an email and we will send it to you. This essay is not unique! Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide. how it works. Tell Us Your Requirements Specify your topic, deadline, death penalty debate essay, number of pages and other requirements. Pick your perfect writer Chat with professional writers to choose the paper writer that suits you best.
Death Penalty Pros And Cons
, time: 3:18The Debate of the Death Penalty - Free Essay Example | blogger.com
· There are numerous debates about the death penalty, as the opinions on this topic differ in different countries of the world. Most countries have abolished the death penalty, but there are still countries where it is used. As you can see, the author of the argumentative essay about the death penalty above considers capital punishment to be Estimated Reading Time: 5 mins The Death Penalty Debate Essay Words | 3 Pages. The Death Penalty Debate To kill or not to kill. That is the question. Some people think it is wrong; however, a close look into the matter will show it is the right thing to do. The Bible states "thou shall not kill" but it also states "an eye for eye" · Death Penalty Debate Essay. Death Penalty Debate Essay Created March 29, ; Author Kimberly Ball; Category Popular Essay Topics; Disclaimer: This paper has been submitted by a student. This is not a sample of the work written by professional academic writers
No comments:
Post a Comment